Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-22 19:57:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98A9E37ACB857700A87024CFB16CB213D214EE16952F5FF6D811DCED4EAEB568
Participant Details

Original Note:

Incorrect/misrepresentation. Bill C-63 has definitions for online harms, targets speech likely to incite hatred or violence and has still not passed into law. It says nothing about retroactive punishment or arbitrary house arrest. Read the current draft of the bill yourself: https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-63/first-reading

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782462866328568057
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98A9E37ACB857700A87024CFB16CB213D214EE16952F5FF6D811DCED4EAEB568
  • createdAtMillis - 1713815835964
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178246286632856805798A9E37ACB857700A87024CFB16CB213D214EE16952F5FF6D811DCED4EAEB568