Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-22 18:09:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6F020C29F9A1C35E51D5B0D7E2E2C1E037F11B21079648BE499410BA8C2C785F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Incorrect/misrepresentation. Bill C-63 has definitions for online harms, targets speech likely to incite hatred or violence and has still not passed into law. It says nothing about retroactive punishment or arbitrary house arrest. Read the current draft of the bill yourself: https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-63/first-reading

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782462866328568057
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6F020C29F9A1C35E51D5B0D7E2E2C1E037F11B21079648BE499410BA8C2C785F
  • createdAtMillis - 1713809390861
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17824628663285680576F020C29F9A1C35E51D5B0D7E2E2C1E037F11B21079648BE499410BA8C2C785F