Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 08:44:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1ED2F6490B939C62F7BD28868B1BE6EE2F38897DA22871533F20F5739909E490
Participant Details

Original Note:

Incorrect/misrepresentation. Bill C-63 has definitions for online harms, targets speech likely to incite hatred or violence and has still not passed into law. It says nothing about retroactive punishment or arbitrary house arrest. Read the current draft of the bill yourself: https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-63/first-reading

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782462866328568057
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1ED2F6490B939C62F7BD28868B1BE6EE2F38897DA22871533F20F5739909E490
  • createdAtMillis - 1713861873593
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17824628663285680571ED2F6490B939C62F7BD28868B1BE6EE2F38897DA22871533F20F5739909E490