Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 04:53:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7CC9290AB487E16D1255E2199252C48F88F88A3DAEF21545DB4891604E6F7CF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Based on the original paper, it seems like this scatterplot was just made up through simulated data, based only on the correlation given. This makes the plot essentially meaningless, as the correlation isn’t sufficient to describe or approximate the actual shape of the data. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289615001269

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782427307468087471
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7CC9290AB487E16D1255E2199252C48F88F88A3DAEF21545DB4891604E6F7CF
  • createdAtMillis - 1713848012571
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1782427307468087471E7CC9290AB487E16D1255E2199252C48F88F88A3DAEF21545DB4891604E6F7CF