Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 12:36:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A90DC5D5F02E2ECACC63C90881B9090BB0958EB6BD6337D0E9A2A3C9AB2C81AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP posted a plot of what the data would look like, but there are no individual-level data points in the source. It’s likely that the plot was made with a random number simulation based on just the correlation number reported in the source. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289615001269

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782412496831144269
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A90DC5D5F02E2ECACC63C90881B9090BB0958EB6BD6337D0E9A2A3C9AB2C81AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1713875790185
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1782412496831144269A90DC5D5F02E2ECACC63C90881B9090BB0958EB6BD6337D0E9A2A3C9AB2C81AE