Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-22 14:59:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35501A3F9249E0893FE8C3514D973D88E8F5B89C574D70BF34F21D74BD5E8246
Participant Details

Original Note:

元ポストの記事は国学院大の「関係者」としか記載していません。 報道用語の「関係者」は内部者ですらない者も含むため、元ポストの記事から「専門家が考案した」と論じるのは飛躍であり、誤解を正すというコミュニティーノートの趣旨に沿いません。 https://ddnavi.com/review/395578/a/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782401621684797783
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35501A3F9249E0893FE8C3514D973D88E8F5B89C574D70BF34F21D74BD5E8246
  • createdAtMillis - 1713797994651
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178240162168479778335501A3F9249E0893FE8C3514D973D88E8F5B89C574D70BF34F21D74BD5E8246