Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 11:51:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC9984FBB5864308F50269599E71ED39832773EE22C8442C1D9CC2E451939D79
Participant Details

Original Note:

I am not sure what is worse, the note itself or that it has somehow managed limited publication. This is about as blatant misuse of CN as you can get

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782335613082960350
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC9984FBB5864308F50269599E71ED39832773EE22C8442C1D9CC2E451939D79
  • createdAtMillis - 1713873119043
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1782335613082960350EC9984FBB5864308F50269599E71ED39832773EE22C8442C1D9CC2E451939D79