Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-22 09:11:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 69010E44C4E4CD51B54D9AF0FE60F4F1020A466FA24FC8D5D9C4A777D2D893CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

I am not sure what is worse, the note itself or that it has somehow managed limited publication. This is about as blatant misuse of CN as you can get

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782335613082960350
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 69010E44C4E4CD51B54D9AF0FE60F4F1020A466FA24FC8D5D9C4A777D2D893CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1713777066216
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178233561308296035069010E44C4E4CD51B54D9AF0FE60F4F1020A466FA24FC8D5D9C4A777D2D893CB