Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 09:11:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07D230ED4272B6107B5F76DB42B0A0EB36E9C227BADC35048192E3BE5FE2AA60
Participant Details

Original Note:

I am not sure what is worse, the note itself or that it has somehow managed limited publication. This is about as blatant misuse of CN as you can get

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782335613082960350
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07D230ED4272B6107B5F76DB42B0A0EB36E9C227BADC35048192E3BE5FE2AA60
  • createdAtMillis - 1713863506306
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178233561308296035007D230ED4272B6107B5F76DB42B0A0EB36E9C227BADC35048192E3BE5FE2AA60