Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-24 19:31:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49A551CC174A0DBBCDE19711F923C19E72ACD1DFA7417A9D6D857AD626096E74
Participant Details

Original Note:

Hace pasar por “estudio científico”, un simple análisis cromatográfico a un solo producto de vapeo cuyo nombre, marca y origen no revela, no está revisado por pares, y no transparenta los resultados completos. Por ello carece de relevancia y no puede ser tomado como evidencia https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491675/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782263430042329168
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49A551CC174A0DBBCDE19711F923C19E72ACD1DFA7417A9D6D857AD626096E74
  • createdAtMillis - 1713987107793
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178226343004232916849A551CC174A0DBBCDE19711F923C19E72ACD1DFA7417A9D6D857AD626096E74