Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-22 05:33:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3CE5418602ECBC8BA0F48D5E9C6DC2A68FC76886A710E847C5E5A26695DD18E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading post. The Supreme Court has not yet pass such judgement. It is still hearing arguments from child protection groups and may or may not uphold the precedent. https://www.thepublica.com/high-court-of-india-rules-that-viewing-downloading-child-pornography-is-not-a-criminal-offense/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782099818665406612
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3CE5418602ECBC8BA0F48D5E9C6DC2A68FC76886A710E847C5E5A26695DD18E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1713763993617
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17820998186654066123CE5418602ECBC8BA0F48D5E9C6DC2A68FC76886A710E847C5E5A26695DD18E3