Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-21 23:01:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 184719653BC83196CDD6CA48BEB9322CEBDFAFAD91E3C76103E80EB2BC96C136
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, Kevin Seefried, who is pictured in this image, did not turn out to be a "federal" based on court records and his own testimony. This Tweet requires a CN as based on the poster's previous posts, this is not a rhetorical question but meant to convince his followers of a lie https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59805289/united-states-v-seefried/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782077108077908416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 184719653BC83196CDD6CA48BEB9322CEBDFAFAD91E3C76103E80EB2BC96C136
  • createdAtMillis - 1713740486271
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1782077108077908416184719653BC83196CDD6CA48BEB9322CEBDFAFAD91E3C76103E80EB2BC96C136