Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-21 23:31:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64A8E93ACD90A74907CFAF425A0A9819E3AA8AC2DA8DA861D1464AC8130774CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

R v Forstater held that Gender Critical beliefs are protected philosophical beliefs and gain protection under the Equality Act 2010 and is perfectly reasonable under Article 9(1) ECHR. The poster is suggesting conduct that is likely contrary to employment law. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c1cce1d3bf7f4bd9814e39/Maya_Forstater_v_CGD_Europe_and_others_UKEAT0105_20_JOJ.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781991539574468850
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64A8E93ACD90A74907CFAF425A0A9819E3AA8AC2DA8DA861D1464AC8130774CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1713742265065
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 178199153957446885064A8E93ACD90A74907CFAF425A0A9819E3AA8AC2DA8DA861D1464AC8130774CB