Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-22 09:25:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 19BBBAD07729CF9632AF5E948C2C3911B3941EC0308C714F109D03B978A7B617
Participant Details

Original Note:

R v Forstater held that Gender Critical beliefs are protected philosophical beliefs and gain protection under the Equality Act 2010 and is perfectly reasonable under Article 9(1) ECHR. The poster is suggesting conduct that is likely contrary to employment law. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c1cce1d3bf7f4bd9814e39/Maya_Forstater_v_CGD_Europe_and_others_UKEAT0105_20_JOJ.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781991539574468850
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 19BBBAD07729CF9632AF5E948C2C3911B3941EC0308C714F109D03B978A7B617
  • createdAtMillis - 1713777933556
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178199153957446885019BBBAD07729CF9632AF5E948C2C3911B3941EC0308C714F109D03B978A7B617