Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-22 11:04:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E998BDC89299D015B60363A679A751D5344FEF8ACD15011CE52B28421DD054B
Participant Details

Original Note:

R v Forstater held that Gender Critical beliefs are protected philosophical beliefs and gain protection under the Equality Act 2010 and is perfectly reasonable under Article 9(1) ECHR. The poster is suggesting conduct that is likely contrary to employment law. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c1cce1d3bf7f4bd9814e39/Maya_Forstater_v_CGD_Europe_and_others_UKEAT0105_20_JOJ.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781991539574468850
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E998BDC89299D015B60363A679A751D5344FEF8ACD15011CE52B28421DD054B
  • createdAtMillis - 1713783869066
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17819915395744688500E998BDC89299D015B60363A679A751D5344FEF8ACD15011CE52B28421DD054B