Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-21 13:50:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 088CE5F0A83D5739E55298C27254C4DF28815F497A1681FCE409E0C1DBB71FA0
Participant Details

Original Note:

R v Forstater held that Gender Critical beliefs are protected philosophical beliefs and gain protection under the Equality Act 2010 and is perfectly reasonable under Article 9(1) ECHR. The poster is suggesting conduct that is likely contrary to employment law. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c1cce1d3bf7f4bd9814e39/Maya_Forstater_v_CGD_Europe_and_others_UKEAT0105_20_JOJ.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781991539574468850
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 088CE5F0A83D5739E55298C27254C4DF28815F497A1681FCE409E0C1DBB71FA0
  • createdAtMillis - 1713707404509
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781991539574468850088CE5F0A83D5739E55298C27254C4DF28815F497A1681FCE409E0C1DBB71FA0