Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-21 10:06:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BCAD09835264A9EE32146CB2321264724B37AE488AE736386CBB4AE63C0492FF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Their profile already openly states, that they are a Chinese affiliated media propaganda account. The proposed notes are not adding any more context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781946470377119819
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BCAD09835264A9EE32146CB2321264724B37AE488AE736386CBB4AE63C0492FF
  • createdAtMillis - 1713694002632
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781946470377119819BCAD09835264A9EE32146CB2321264724B37AE488AE736386CBB4AE63C0492FF