Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-21 05:39:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D893C75F58F7BF2288EC4D186AD5AA458C676C41CB718BF6A0D99110F51CD69B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study did not 'find' this as a final conclusion. It used the words "may be attributable" before stressing that further studies are required on this. As of now, most reputed agencies term such conclusions as 'misinformation'. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.34P674Q

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1781896425464267228
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D893C75F58F7BF2288EC4D186AD5AA458C676C41CB718BF6A0D99110F51CD69B
createdAtMillis - 1713677997371
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1781896425464267228D893C75F58F7BF2288EC4D186AD5AA458C676C41CB718BF6A0D99110F51CD69B