Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-21 09:58:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4FC395DE56962D76E528906B52134A5C91E51A4E90228B62FAAE23E4080511C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. You can't cite the Cass report itself when claiming that it's a well researched piece of reporting.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781827645623443921
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4FC395DE56962D76E528906B52134A5C91E51A4E90228B62FAAE23E4080511C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1713693490760
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17818276456234439214FC395DE56962D76E528906B52134A5C91E51A4E90228B62FAAE23E4080511C1