Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-21 13:35:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EEFE40AD2AC88D7A5F56CBB2D5CAADCB95D3A5E9F076F9FE051A490B3E44E423
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The claim in the proposed note is not what the BMJ article says, is untrue and is contradicted by Cass. Two studies were assessed as high quality but the others were not all discounted. About 60 were included in the synthesis. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-68863594

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781823172330860617
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EEFE40AD2AC88D7A5F56CBB2D5CAADCB95D3A5E9F076F9FE051A490B3E44E423
  • createdAtMillis - 1713706542039
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781823172330860617EEFE40AD2AC88D7A5F56CBB2D5CAADCB95D3A5E9F076F9FE051A490B3E44E423