Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-21 02:10:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 78A51A2DE718A3D4E48A11B55020E34DD8D474A46E926EA85FE6A2EF092567C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The claim in the proposed note is not what the BMJ article says, is untrue and is contradicted by Cass. Two studies were assessed as high quality but the others were not all discounted. About 60 were included in the synthesis. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-68863594

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781823172330860617
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 78A51A2DE718A3D4E48A11B55020E34DD8D474A46E926EA85FE6A2EF092567C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1713665432043
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178182317233086061778A51A2DE718A3D4E48A11B55020E34DD8D474A46E926EA85FE6A2EF092567C4