Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-21 02:11:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 665F8E12820CEDC9F31DCD2A3CDFD2083DA951ABA2F07337B5622F751A092101
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The claim in the proposed note is not what the BMJ article says, is untrue and is contradicted by Cass. Two studies were assessed as high quality but the others were not all discounted. About 60 were included in the synthesis. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-68863594

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781823172330860617
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 665F8E12820CEDC9F31DCD2A3CDFD2083DA951ABA2F07337B5622F751A092101
  • createdAtMillis - 1713665473169
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781823172330860617665F8E12820CEDC9F31DCD2A3CDFD2083DA951ABA2F07337B5622F751A092101