Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-21 15:51:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 061508B1DEAC295B3A9DD1110A67C64E4648295EBCDAAE3B7573723A9F305F2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The claim in the proposed note is not what the BMJ article says, is untrue and is contradicted by Cass. Two studies were assessed as high quality but the others were not all discounted. About 60 were included in the synthesis. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-68863594

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781823172330860617
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 061508B1DEAC295B3A9DD1110A67C64E4648295EBCDAAE3B7573723A9F305F2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1713714677431
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781823172330860617061508B1DEAC295B3A9DD1110A67C64E4648295EBCDAAE3B7573723A9F305F2F