Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-21 15:13:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A65BF1652A173ABDDB1F146B8ABCCDB4C60B76C9F1A86B750C5436749EC5510
Participant Details

Original Note:

Rolling Stone is promoting a baseless conspiracy theory without any facts to back up their claims. Rolling Stone has a history of false narratives based on “sources familiar” and have lost lawsuits in the past for this unethical practice. https://www.cjr.org/opinion/wenner-uva-rolling-stone-scandal.php https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37879151.amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1781800036436779501
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 4A65BF1652A173ABDDB1F146B8ABCCDB4C60B76C9F1A86B750C5436749EC5510
createdAtMillis - 1713712417994
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 17818000364367795014A65BF1652A173ABDDB1F146B8ABCCDB4C60B76C9F1A86B750C5436749EC5510