Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 23:43:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E34A7D8D57EBE55AC70A2821FFF290C3ADCEA158B7CD9696AFD184E20A08B0AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. 1) Numerous clinicians & researchers have criticized the report, not just activists. 2) Cass didn't produce the report single-handed, so her personal background is irrelevant. 3) The OP is stating her own opinion as a candidate. The proposed CNs belong in the Replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781784014132817948
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E34A7D8D57EBE55AC70A2821FFF290C3ADCEA158B7CD9696AFD184E20A08B0AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1713656601842
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781784014132817948E34A7D8D57EBE55AC70A2821FFF290C3ADCEA158B7CD9696AFD184E20A08B0AB