Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 20:38:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7D4B39D66A7757305197816D28B31F19E49ED81C065815724A82D260E3769ED6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. 1) Numerous clinicians & researchers have criticized the report, not just activists. 2) Cass didn't produce the report single-handed, so her personal background is irrelevant. 3) The OP is stating her own opinion as a candidate. The proposed CNs belong in the Replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781784014132817948
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7D4B39D66A7757305197816D28B31F19E49ED81C065815724A82D260E3769ED6
  • createdAtMillis - 1713645496324
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17817840141328179487D4B39D66A7757305197816D28B31F19E49ED81C065815724A82D260E3769ED6