Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 22:28:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0EECAE1ADFFC86A9E69E8B059485D5DB3904F8F0A354E98E0E7906229ED7D01B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. 1) Numerous clinicians & researchers have criticized the report, not just activists. 2) Cass didn't produce the report single-handed, so her personal background is irrelevant. 3) The OP is stating her own opinion as a candidate. The proposed CNs belong in the Replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781784014132817948
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0EECAE1ADFFC86A9E69E8B059485D5DB3904F8F0A354E98E0E7906229ED7D01B
  • createdAtMillis - 1713652101380
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17817840141328179480EECAE1ADFFC86A9E69E8B059485D5DB3904F8F0A354E98E0E7906229ED7D01B