Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 13:54:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading. The legislation to ban TikTok already passed the House 352-65, a wide bipartisan margin on March 13. https://apnews.com/article/tiktok-ban-house-vote-china-national-security-8fa7258fae1a4902d344c9d978d58a37 https://usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/04/18/tiktok-ban-congress-ukraine-israel/73373746007/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1781673283617779768
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE
createdAtMillis - 1713621288653
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1781673283617779768F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE