Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 21:49:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F83D3FCDA99D61A368C7A64796FE3595CAD5664593ECFE36650E3FDEC650A0D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading. The legislation to ban TikTok already passed the House 352-65, a wide bipartisan margin on March 13. https://apnews.com/article/tiktok-ban-house-vote-china-national-security-8fa7258fae1a4902d344c9d978d58a37 https://usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/04/18/tiktok-ban-congress-ukraine-israel/73373746007/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1781673283617779768
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F83D3FCDA99D61A368C7A64796FE3595CAD5664593ECFE36650E3FDEC650A0D0
createdAtMillis - 1713649740739
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1781673283617779768F83D3FCDA99D61A368C7A64796FE3595CAD5664593ECFE36650E3FDEC650A0D0