Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 16:16:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85ED55E2D9A2417D7242FDCFFFEB63659BF3C6EC86C1C52D71B4DE3056525BAF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Both of the suggested notes are of exceptionally poor quality. The post reports on a statement, made in response to coverage of the Cass Report, by some of the contributors to the Report. Citing the original Cass Report as your source proves nothing about the new statement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781652873509847487
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85ED55E2D9A2417D7242FDCFFFEB63659BF3C6EC86C1C52D71B4DE3056525BAF
  • createdAtMillis - 1713629807277
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178165287350984748785ED55E2D9A2417D7242FDCFFFEB63659BF3C6EC86C1C52D71B4DE3056525BAF