Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 20:13:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CB8751B9241DEE9BBA536EB6BFBCC8C460F22E9C354B0C3287D9C5250D89D3F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Both of the suggested notes are of exceptionally poor quality. The post reports on a statement, made in response to coverage of the Cass Report, by some of the contributors to the Report. Citing the original Cass Report as your source proves nothing about the new statement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781652873509847487
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4CB8751B9241DEE9BBA536EB6BFBCC8C460F22E9C354B0C3287D9C5250D89D3F
  • createdAtMillis - 1713643995915
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17816528735098474874CB8751B9241DEE9BBA536EB6BFBCC8C460F22E9C354B0C3287D9C5250D89D3F