Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 13:47:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47285FAA2C095C471F3F1E6268F9C3905418D4268FA827F3DA2F524922A875C0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Both of the suggested notes are of exceptionally poor quality. The post reports on a statement, made in response to coverage of the Cass Report, by some of the contributors to the Report. Citing the original Cass Report as your source proves nothing about the new statement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781652873509847487
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 47285FAA2C095C471F3F1E6268F9C3905418D4268FA827F3DA2F524922A875C0
  • createdAtMillis - 1713620858972
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178165287350984748747285FAA2C095C471F3F1E6268F9C3905418D4268FA827F3DA2F524922A875C0