Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 11:32:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9A9A9883FD11EDF3B3DB179B0EEE34A2CD2435912756D11752F1160340F9C25C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note is needed. This is not his opinion, his language - “there is no chance” - suggests he is right and the newspaper (higher quality source) is wrong. His story is his clout gamble, as he knows he is too far gone to drop it and he’s the only one reporting it. Read links. https://www.ojogo.pt/5460416041/frederico-varandas-acredita-ter-argumentos-para-segurar-amorim/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781646210320789669
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9A9A9883FD11EDF3B3DB179B0EEE34A2CD2435912756D11752F1160340F9C25C
  • createdAtMillis - 1713612765592
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17816462103207896699A9A9883FD11EDF3B3DB179B0EEE34A2CD2435912756D11752F1160340F9C25C