Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 16:00:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 483DB088255F9AC78A292B67F7FF567168FB862478FCD180D828F6D7E74C9AB6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note is needed. This is not his opinion, his language - “there is no chance” - suggests he is right and the newspaper (higher quality source) is wrong. His story is his clout gamble, as he knows he is too far gone to drop it and he’s the only one reporting it. Read links. https://www.ojogo.pt/5460416041/frederico-varandas-acredita-ter-argumentos-para-segurar-amorim/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781646210320789669
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 483DB088255F9AC78A292B67F7FF567168FB862478FCD180D828F6D7E74C9AB6
  • createdAtMillis - 1713628843028
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781646210320789669483DB088255F9AC78A292B67F7FF567168FB862478FCD180D828F6D7E74C9AB6