Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-21 11:52:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0D9AC9E70D6BBD1F902D6547B321EE2B482F4CC3B6F84DD2466AAF2FA0D3717
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is an article about a summary of an alleged interview with Dr Cass. The interview notes are third party interpretations of comments not quotes. The fact remains “This is an area of remarkably weak evidence,” read the Cass report yourself! https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781591132499030147
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0D9AC9E70D6BBD1F902D6547B321EE2B482F4CC3B6F84DD2466AAF2FA0D3717
  • createdAtMillis - 1713700371851
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1781591132499030147B0D9AC9E70D6BBD1F902D6547B321EE2B482F4CC3B6F84DD2466AAF2FA0D3717