Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 14:22:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4AA6EEFDA49DBCA648756324096807BC724E33F75712FBF7F3C4A68506194CB7
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is an article about a summary of an alleged interview with Dr Cass. The interview notes are third party interpretations of comments not quotes. The fact remains “This is an area of remarkably weak evidence,” read the Cass report yourself! https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781591132499030147
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4AA6EEFDA49DBCA648756324096807BC724E33F75712FBF7F3C4A68506194CB7
  • createdAtMillis - 1713622979623
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17815911324990301474AA6EEFDA49DBCA648756324096807BC724E33F75712FBF7F3C4A68506194CB7