Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-24 00:34:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 16C4B8C971A37037B796D17488DD1663E2DF7093DBA904E418643DD575B49A35
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is an article about a summary of an alleged interview with Dr Cass. The interview notes are third party interpretations of comments not quotes. The fact remains “This is an area of remarkably weak evidence,” read the Cass report yourself! https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781591132499030147
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 16C4B8C971A37037B796D17488DD1663E2DF7093DBA904E418643DD575B49A35
  • createdAtMillis - 1716510863566
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 178159113249903014716C4B8C971A37037B796D17488DD1663E2DF7093DBA904E418643DD575B49A35