Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 14:25:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00C8EADD88D768189205EC797F8F559E06C99B8EFF2A6EF484155D9AD459F23E
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is an article about a summary of an alleged interview with Dr Cass. The interview notes are third party interpretations of comments not quotes. The fact remains “This is an area of remarkably weak evidence,” read the Cass report yourself! https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781591132499030147
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00C8EADD88D768189205EC797F8F559E06C99B8EFF2A6EF484155D9AD459F23E
  • createdAtMillis - 1713623122578
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178159113249903014700C8EADD88D768189205EC797F8F559E06C99B8EFF2A6EF484155D9AD459F23E