Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 11:42:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F09987EDAB484D480764145BBF13023387679512EC312843DE3716586C5B211
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass Review (sections 9.20–9.23) cites research showing that "few guidelines systematically reviewed empirical evidence". Instead, through the use of circular citations (each guideline citing the other), these guidelines create a misleading appearance of consensus. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/ https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326499

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781501042397450294
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F09987EDAB484D480764145BBF13023387679512EC312843DE3716586C5B211
  • createdAtMillis - 1713613334969
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17815010423974502944F09987EDAB484D480764145BBF13023387679512EC312843DE3716586C5B211