Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 02:44:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D45CE7D9D53D89CE3A86A21946FBC25C8F2625D582343D31FFE59D8A23B0DF73
Participant Details

Original Note:

Comme le mentionne la décision, le tribunal considère que les faits allégués de diffamation publique envers un particulier sont suffisamment étayés. Le tribunal ordonne à X de communiquer sous 15j les données permettant d’identifier l’utilisateur du compte Zoé Sagan Source: https://www.courdecassation.fr/decision/65f4a04ef10468b3f5b8042e

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781449018276471251
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D45CE7D9D53D89CE3A86A21946FBC25C8F2625D582343D31FFE59D8A23B0DF73
  • createdAtMillis - 1713581072507
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781449018276471251D45CE7D9D53D89CE3A86A21946FBC25C8F2625D582343D31FFE59D8A23B0DF73