Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-20 02:00:06 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B749536AA7D18327ECAFBCF759AA1FC195C2DE3298298723B4C2146E4CB37D4A
Participant Details
Original Note:
Cass was a systematic review. Part of the review critiqued all of the guidelines mentioned in the post and found serious deficiencies in all of them, including poor quality evidence and many circular references. That is why the Cass report contradicts them. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/
All Note Details