Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-19 22:05:57 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6BE56D6CF8651343F4678A0DBF62F2FC501C99599FEC1050E84484D4CE7670AC
Participant Details
Original Note:
Cass was a systematic review. Part of the review critiqued all of the guidelines mentioned in the post and found serious deficiencies in all of them, including poor quality evidence and many circular references. That is why the Cass report contradicts them. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/
All Note Details