Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 10:55:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A301C42EF321D3B6F61C3B81D91C582171581EA92779237AC5421866ADA4A95
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no attempt to misrepresent the source for this graph. The Cass Review makes it clear this is an online survey of self-identified participants. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781385543202357361
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A301C42EF321D3B6F61C3B81D91C582171581EA92779237AC5421866ADA4A95
  • createdAtMillis - 1713610520887
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17813855432023573612A301C42EF321D3B6F61C3B81D91C582171581EA92779237AC5421866ADA4A95