Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-19 17:34:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C64429984F71D7D4AB7E65EE3AD2F8692FC9D6F9AB1AA2B27FC793BCFF763F61
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. Those who determined the suspension of WhatsApp were the 2nd Criminal Court of Duque de Caxias and the judgment of the Criminal Court of Lagarto, Sergipe. This decision got overturned and now is in plenary judgment on STF - Moraes voted against the block. https://noticias.uol.com.br/ultimas-noticias/agencia-estado/2024/04/19/stf-volta-a-julgar-bloqueio-do-whatsapp-fachin-e-moraes-votam-contra.htm https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/amp/mercado/2024/04/stf-julga-processo-sobre-bloqueio-do-whatsapp-no-pais.shtml https://www.metropoles.com/brasil/em-meio-a-crise-com-x-stf-analisa-acao-sobre-derrubar-whatsapp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781374092282655192
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C64429984F71D7D4AB7E65EE3AD2F8692FC9D6F9AB1AA2B27FC793BCFF763F61
  • createdAtMillis - 1713548078880
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781374092282655192C64429984F71D7D4AB7E65EE3AD2F8692FC9D6F9AB1AA2B27FC793BCFF763F61