Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-19 18:53:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7F8E27EAC0E50513D7043E2989E6C5774FE11C5CEE404C465B14237FBE64E7A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. Those who determined the suspension of WhatsApp were the 2nd Criminal Court of Duque de Caxias and the judgment of the Criminal Court of Lagarto, Sergipe. This decision got overturned and now is in plenary judgment on STF - Moraes voted against the block. https://noticias.uol.com.br/ultimas-noticias/agencia-estado/2024/04/19/stf-volta-a-julgar-bloqueio-do-whatsapp-fachin-e-moraes-votam-contra.htm https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/amp/mercado/2024/04/stf-julga-processo-sobre-bloqueio-do-whatsapp-no-pais.shtml https://www.metropoles.com/brasil/em-meio-a-crise-com-x-stf-analisa-acao-sobre-derrubar-whatsapp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781374092282655192
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7F8E27EAC0E50513D7043E2989E6C5774FE11C5CEE404C465B14237FBE64E7A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1713552805674
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17813740922826551927F8E27EAC0E50513D7043E2989E6C5774FE11C5CEE404C465B14237FBE64E7A8