Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-19 18:29:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5DA14294AE6C0EDC028F192F6ED93490B5DEE215E1F75F3E725B06CB79BD8E74
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. Those who determined the suspension of WhatsApp were the 2nd Criminal Court of Duque de Caxias and the judgment of the Criminal Court of Lagarto, Sergipe. This decision got overturned and now is in plenary judgment on STF - Moraes voted against the block. https://noticias.uol.com.br/ultimas-noticias/agencia-estado/2024/04/19/stf-volta-a-julgar-bloqueio-do-whatsapp-fachin-e-moraes-votam-contra.htm https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/amp/mercado/2024/04/stf-julga-processo-sobre-bloqueio-do-whatsapp-no-pais.shtml https://www.metropoles.com/brasil/em-meio-a-crise-com-x-stf-analisa-acao-sobre-derrubar-whatsapp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781374092282655192
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5DA14294AE6C0EDC028F192F6ED93490B5DEE215E1F75F3E725B06CB79BD8E74
  • createdAtMillis - 1713551370535
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17813740922826551925DA14294AE6C0EDC028F192F6ED93490B5DEE215E1F75F3E725B06CB79BD8E74