Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-19 18:24:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E9B38B213FDE68C2C51C8A747E278A2C36AF0DE72B4D269E481C124153A89BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. Those who determined the suspension of WhatsApp were the 2nd Criminal Court of Duque de Caxias and the judgment of the Criminal Court of Lagarto, Sergipe. This decision got overturned and now is in plenary judgment on STF - Moraes voted against the block. https://noticias.uol.com.br/ultimas-noticias/agencia-estado/2024/04/19/stf-volta-a-julgar-bloqueio-do-whatsapp-fachin-e-moraes-votam-contra.htm https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/amp/mercado/2024/04/stf-julga-processo-sobre-bloqueio-do-whatsapp-no-pais.shtml https://www.metropoles.com/brasil/em-meio-a-crise-com-x-stf-analisa-acao-sobre-derrubar-whatsapp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781374092282655192
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E9B38B213FDE68C2C51C8A747E278A2C36AF0DE72B4D269E481C124153A89BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1713551042451
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17813740922826551922E9B38B213FDE68C2C51C8A747E278A2C36AF0DE72B4D269E481C124153A89BC