Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-19 17:09:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: EA4EACC7C1D1BB1AAE8FEBEF91A3E452303C6D32B6F25FCCD7DF8145F7EE0916
Participant Details
Original Note:
This statement proves Met Police to be against PRA '02 in regards to impartiality and human rights. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/30/section/83 It engages victim blaming language and criticises the right to film. https://www.met.police.uk/advice/advice-and-information/ph/photography-advice#:~:text=Freedom%20to%20photograph%20and%20film,photographing%20incidents%20or%20police%20personnel False: It is not up to the police to determine balance; public, MoPAC & London assembly do. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/policing-by-consent/definition-of-policing-by-consent https://www.london.gov.uk/ https://www.london.gov.uk/programmes-strategies/mayors-office-policing-and-crime-mopac/about-mayors-office-policing-and-crime-mopac#:~:text=One%20of%20the%20Mayor's%20key,efficient%20and%20effective%20service%20to https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/16/section/29
All Note Details