Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 08:31:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EA96DC2A94B88ACA426D202BFFB82D0FB9618CFB4C9330E2768F56043D5AB34D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The $45 trillion figure is controversial. It's based on assuming 5% compound interest since 1765 (assuming 2% instead would reduce the figure to just $69bn), and it assumes that all net exports to the UK from India were being "drained" regardless of how they were paid for. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/gc3ifr/utsa_patnaik_claims_that_the_british_siphoned_45/fp9yyx0/ https://www.reddit.com/r/AskEconomics/comments/xb2bho/ive_seen_a_lot_of_posts_in_the_last_few_days/inxfwfa/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781303581729001756
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EA96DC2A94B88ACA426D202BFFB82D0FB9618CFB4C9330E2768F56043D5AB34D
  • createdAtMillis - 1713601869676
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781303581729001756EA96DC2A94B88ACA426D202BFFB82D0FB9618CFB4C9330E2768F56043D5AB34D