Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-19 14:26:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1ADDA8D9315BA884C54CDA1437410E1B4E9FC26EB0C81110E39EB35AA7DC4967
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Richard did indeed deny climate SCIENCE as this post claims.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781293714964373982
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1ADDA8D9315BA884C54CDA1437410E1B4E9FC26EB0C81110E39EB35AA7DC4967
  • createdAtMillis - 1713536764955
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17812937149643739821ADDA8D9315BA884C54CDA1437410E1B4E9FC26EB0C81110E39EB35AA7DC4967